1. 17:02 23rd Apr 2014

    Notes: 207

    Reblogged from the-treble

    the-treble:

    llamajun:

    Someone on Reddit is claiming that they, a 27 year old man, mistook a 12 year old girl for a 17 year old and had sex with her (age of consent in his state is 16). She was in a state facility designed for those with behavioral issues, and he met her at his gym.

    In the comments, he states “I figured she was anywhere from 14 to 18. If I had been forced to guess, I would have said 16.” (handy that he says he would put her age at exactly the age of consent) He says he’ll kill himself if he gets convicted. He’s blaming her adviser for saying nothing when they exchanged numbers.

    I had to scroll almost to the bottom before I found anyone calling him out for being a skeeve. The rest of the posts are all wishing him well, saying the girl deserves a beating, saying they’ll pray for him, or sharing stories of their own “underage girl who cried rape”.

    A few questions:
    1. How in the hell does someone think a 12 year old is 17?
    2. Why in the hell is a fully grown man chasing after teenagers, especially when they know the teenager is undergoing treatment for behavioral problems?
    3. Why is everyone supporting him?

    I can pretty much answer my own questions, unfortunately.
    1. He didn’t actually think she was 17, but that sounds a hell of a lot better than “I wanted to bang a 12 year old”.
    2. He knows teenagers are easier targets for sexual predators, [i]especially[/i] if they’re struggling with getting their shit together.
    3. His supporters want to be able to get away with the same thing because they’re creepy fuckers.

    I genuinely think this is why so many (mostly straight white) men fight so vehemently against the exposure of rape culture and reformation of laws related to sex crimes. The smaller that “grey area” gets, the harder it is for them to get away with rape.

    All of those guys who are claiming that they also have stories about underage girls crying rape should probably be hunted down.

     
  2. 17:00

    Notes: 257

    Reblogged from dpsg1

    dpsg1:

    creativegirl31:

    "Life Lessons" - Danny/Valerie

    Is it bad that I shipped this a LOT more than Danny and Sam? :(

    no; it is actually the opposite of bad.

    unless you didn’t want your heart ripped in half.  then it’s kinda bad.

     
  3. 17:00

    Notes: 148724

    Reblogged from sadetakki

    annaharvelle:

    dont worry under-appreciated character im coming to defend you

    image

    (Source: annaharvellemoved)

     
  4. 16:35

    Notes: 171861

    Reblogged from pippinforthewin

    flaw-in-the-plan:

    lunatoneitdown:

    the face on the hot sauce is the guy who plays spongebob

    literally every human character on spongebob was played by the guy who voiced spongebob

    (Source: bryko)

     
  5. 16:33

    Notes: 12292

    Reblogged from the-treble

    the-treble:

    bonusvampirus:

    *makes heterophobic text post*

    It’s a metaphor, see? You make a mean text post, but you don’t back it with thousands of years of violently-upheld institutional power, so it doesn’t have the power to actually hurt anyone. 

    best one yet

     
  6. 16:30

    Notes: 29957

    Reblogged from lenkagamine133

    towritecomicsonherarms:

    Ultimate Avengers vs. New Ultimates #4

    image

    manly tears

    (Source: americachavez)

     
  7. 16:23

    Notes: 3361

    Reblogged from celebrin

    image: Download

    50s-dad:

fivehundredrevolutions:

A handy guide to some of the terrible things the Mail has printed since 1924.
This barely scratches the surface, though, I find it hard to believe they didn’t do anything terrible between 1956 and 1984.

and yet people still use it as a source
leftists from outside the UK still use it as a source
you all need to stop using the Daily Mail as a source FOREVER. Do not reblog, do not link, do not go to their site because they profit off ad traffic, and tell anybody you see doing any of these to immediately and permanently stop. We can’t run them into the ground but we can at least put a little dent in their profits and we can at least stop legitimising their bile by giving them anything other than negative attention.

    50s-dad:

    fivehundredrevolutions:

    A handy guide to some of the terrible things the Mail has printed since 1924.

    This barely scratches the surface, though, I find it hard to believe they didn’t do anything terrible between 1956 and 1984.

    and yet people still use it as a source

    leftists from outside the UK still use it as a source

    you all need to stop using the Daily Mail as a source FOREVER. Do not reblog, do not link, do not go to their site because they profit off ad traffic, and tell anybody you see doing any of these to immediately and permanently stop. We can’t run them into the ground but we can at least put a little dent in their profits and we can at least stop legitimising their bile by giving them anything other than negative attention.

     
  8. 16:18

    Notes: 55802

    Reblogged from sadetakki

    Tags: THIS I LIKE

    cumber-porn:

charlotteiq:

jade-cooper:

sarah-belham:

"The Favorite" by Omar Rayyan

Favorite what? Demon?!

Loving the fact that whatever it is is wearing a matching flower.

WTF!!!

    cumber-porn:

    charlotteiq:

    jade-cooper:

    sarah-belham:

    "The Favorite" by Omar Rayyan

    Favorite what? Demon?!

    Loving the fact that whatever it is is wearing a matching flower.

    WTF!!!

    (Source: atomicgardens)

     
  9. 16:17

    Notes: 35152

    Reblogged from sadetakki

    cumberbear:

    image

    There is no escape from this. 

     
  10. 16:16

    Notes: 77

    Reblogged from ddixonss

    Tags: oh wow this is goodD:

    this will be my last confession
    i love you never felt like any blessing

    (Source: samcr0w)